For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
On Friday the 18th of June, Karoline Rakneberg Haug will defend her thesis entitled, 'Transfer of Movables: A Comparison of the Unitary Approach and the Scandinavian Functional Approach'. Follow live using the link below.
Event details of Public defense PhD thesis Karoline Rakneberg Haug
Date
18 June 2021
Time
10:00 -12:00

Supervisors

prof. dr. A.F. Salomons Universiteit van Amsterdam
prof. dr. A. Veneziano Università degli studi di Teramo

Thesis abstract

Transfer of Movables:

A Comparison of the Unitary Approach and the Scandinavian Functional Approach

The topic of this study is two competing approaches to transfer of ownership in movables: the unitary approach and the Scandinavian functional approach. It is defining of the unitary approach that legal systems adhering to it operate with a designated moment for the transfer of ownership. At this moment, ownership is in principle transferred in bulk. In the Scandinavian functional approach, no unitary moment for the transfer of ownership is defined. Instead of being structured around the ownership concept, the Scandinavian transfer systems regulate conflicts between competing rights separately.

Through a comparative analysis of French, Dutch, Swedish and Norwegian law, the study assesses the practical implications of following the one or the other approach.

Based on an analysis of the solution to practical conflict situations concerning transfer of movables, it is argued that the difference between the unitary and the functional approach does not lie in the outcome reached in concrete conflicts situations. On this matter, the approaches are agnostic. The study argues that the vital difference between the approaches is in the path taken in reaching these solutions, i.e. the legal reasoning applied by lawyers from legal systems following a unitary and functional approach. Three main differences in thought patterns are identified and explained as expressions of different legal mentalities.

The extended summary is available below

Online event

This event will be livestreamed and is open for all to follow.  The final options for attending will be determined based upon the Covid-19 health regulations in Amsterdam at the moment. More information will be posted once available. Questions? email act-fdr@uva.nl